29.6.22

Uzbekistan: Medical examination adds weight to allegations that Alexander Trofimov was tortured in detention in May 2021


International Partnership for Human Rights (IPHR) and the Association for Human Rights in Central Asia (AHRCA) take note of some progress in the case of Alexander Trofimov, after Chilanzar Prosecutor’s Office in Tashkent launched an investigation into allegations that he was tortured last year. The Prosecutor’s Office ordered a chest scan which showed traces of a fracture on his 12th rib, adding weight to Trofimov’s allegations that police officers beat him around that area while he was in pre-trial detention in May 2021. The medical examination was carried out after Trofimov’s lawyer had repeatedly lodged complaints with the General Prosecutor's Office of Uzbekistan.

In November 2021, IPHR and AHRCA called on the Uzbekistani authorities to carry out an effective investigation into the allegations that Alexander Trofimov was tortured in police detention in May 2021. The organisations are now calling on the Uzbekistani authorities to open a criminal investigation under Article 235 of the Criminal Code (“torture”), identify the perpetrators and bring them to justice in a fair trial. The authorities should also award compensation to Alexander Trofimov for the physical and moral harm he suffered at the hands of law enforcement officials.      

Detention, torture and remand hearing

Alexander Trofimov was arrested on 6 May 2021 on suspicion of theft and reports that he was tortured and ill-treated by some five police officers in the Department for the Coordination of Activities of Tashkent’s Chilanzar District Internal Affairs Bodies on 6 and 7 May 2021 in order to force him to “confess” and incriminate others. Trofimov alleges that the officers put a black bag over his head; kicked him; hit him with truncheons; punched him on the head, body and legs; forced him to do the splits; and took turns to jump on his back while he was handcuffed. Trofimov reportedly begged the officers not to hit him over the head, explaining that he had sustained a skull fracture in relation to which he is registered as disabled.

Trofimov was detained without contact with the outside world until 8 May and his relatives were not informed about his whereabouts. When his mother learnt of the police abuse, she lodged complaints with the Prosecutor General's Office and Chilanzar District Prosecutor's Office calling for a swift investigation.

Trofimov saw his lawyer for the first time briefly before his remand hearing on 8 May 2021 and the lawyer took photos of injuries on his body. During the hearing the lawyer  informed the court of the allegations of torture, showed the photos and asked Alexander to show his injuries. The lawyer also presented a video in court filmed earlier that day by Trofimov’s mother, Galiya Trofimova which showed the police officers who accompanied her son to court. According to Alexander, the same officers were involved in his abuse. The judge ruled to remand Trofimov in custody and ordered a forensic medical examination, but did not specify which questions the experts should clarify.

Medical examinations and investigation into allegations of torture, compensation

As the authorities failed to conduct a prompt and thorough medical examination into Trofimov’s allegations of torture,  it is likely that important evidence was lost. Nevertheless, subsequent medical examinations ordered by the authorities as well as a medical examination that Alexander Trofimov commissioned after his release on parole in a private clinic reveal injuries that appear to confirm Trofimov’s allegations of police abuse.

Instead of taking Trofimov to the forensic medical examination shortly after the remand hearing on 8 May 2021, police transferred him to the Chilanzar District Health Department. According to Galiya Trofimova, the accompanying officers urged the doctors to certify that Trofimov already had bruises on his body when he was arrested. But the doctors refused to provide false evidence.

The police officers then waited until 10 May – probably in the hope that his injuries would be less visible – before taking Trofimov again to the same health department. There medical staff recorded bruising to his legs and back. Later that day Trofimov was taken to the Main Office of Forensic Medicine of the Ministry of Health for the requested forensic medical examination.

Two months later and after several requests  Galiya Trofimova was able to see the results of the forensic medical examination at Tashkent City Prosecutor’s Office, but neither she nor the lawyer were able to obtain a copy of the document. According to her, the forensic medical experts only conducted an external examination and only recorded visible injuries – bruises. They did not carry out CT or MRI scans to establish whether he had sustained internal injuries.

On 12 August 2021, Trofimov was released on parole. Shortly afterwards independent medical doctors took an x-ray of his ribs and found a possible trace of a fracture. In May 2022, Chilanzar Prosecutor’s Office ordered a scan [1]  of Trofimov’s chest which also found a fracture on his 12th rib.

On 12 May, during a press briefing at the Agency of Information and Mass Communication, Gulom Mirzayev, the Head of the Information Service of the governmental National Centre for Human Rights of Uzbekistan stated that damage caused by unlawful actions as a result or torture or degrading treatment or punishment would be fully compensated by the state. IPHR and AHRCA call on the Uzbekistani authorities to fully compensate Alexander Trofimov for the physical and moral harm he suffered at the hands of law enforcement officials.

The criminal case against Trofimov

Alexander Trofimov alleges that  police officers subjected him to torture and ill-treatment in May 2021 in order to force him to confess to theft. Trofimov maintains his innocence. 

One of his co-accused reportedly stated that he had seen Trofimov for the first time at the inquest and had never communicated with him before.

On 21 November 2021, Alexander Trofimov and his lawyer met with the investigator of the criminal case against Trofimov for the first time in seven months. They learnt that the charge of “theft” was dropped, and that he had instead been charged with “obtaining or selling stolen property” (Article 171 of the Criminal Code) and “failure to report a crime” (Article 241).

In November 2021, by decision of the Sergeli Department for Coordinating Tashkent City Internal Affairs Bodies, the criminal case against Trofimov and the other defendants was closed. The prosecutor's office subsequently appealed this decision and the investigation was resumed.

In April 2022, the investigation into the accusations of theft against Trofimov and his co-defendants was suspended.


*[1Multispiral computed tomography (MSCT) of the chest organs




7.6.22

There is no excuse — criminalization of consensual sex between men in Uzbekistan is a human rights violation


Read the report in English, Russian, and Uzbek.

The Uzbekistani authorities should swiftly decriminalize consensual sex between men, according to the conclusions of a new report published today by the Association for Human Rights in Central Asia (AHRCA), the Eurasian Coalition on Health, Rights, Gender and Sexual Diversity (ECOM) and International Partnership for Human Rights (IPHR). The groups say that it is imperative for Uzbekistan to make progress toward enshrining its international human rights commitments into law at this time, while a new draft Criminal Code is still under consideration.

Article 120 of the Criminal Code of Uzbekistan punishes consensual sexual relations between men by up to three years’ imprisonment. While an increasing number of countries around the world protect lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, intersex and queer people from discrimination and have outlawed punishment for same-sex relations, the report Like living on a different planet: Gays, bisexual men and trans people vulnerable to abuse, imprisonment and discrimination in Uzbekistan demonstrates that lesbians, gays, bisexual and trans people (LGBT) in Uzbekistan are at constant risk of serious human rights violations without any possible recourse to justice. Uzbekistan is one of only two former Soviet countries that have not decriminalised homosexuality.
     
In Uzbekistan, the criminalization of consensual sexual relations between men, widespread societal and religious homo- and transphobia, Russian policy influence and anti-Western sentiment amount to a toxic mix for LGBT people. 
         
A young gay man from Uzbekistan summed up the situation of LGBT people in his country: “It’s as if we lived on a different planet, where it is normal to hate, imprison, discriminate and kill people simply for who they are.”
        
International human rights law makes it very clear that the criminalization of same-sex relations between consenting adults is a human rights violation. United Nations treaty bodies have repeatedly called on Uzbekistan to repeal Article 120 from the Criminal Code,” said Anne Sunder-Plassmann of IPHR.
      
Information submitted to IPHR by the National Centre for Human Rights of Uzbekistan (NCHR) and the Ombudsperson for Human Rights of the Oliy Majlis (Legislative Chamber of Parliament) in January and February 2022 respectively indicates that 36 persons were convicted under the Article in 2021, 25 of them to terms of imprisonment.
    3 logo 
However, these statistics represent only the mere tip of the iceberg and, in reality, many more people live under the looming threat of Article 120 in their daily lives. Our joint report documents police exploitation of the criminalization of homosexuality and the societal shame associated with it in order to threaten and intimidate gay and bisexual men with imprisonment and to extort money from them in exchange for not opening a criminal case or for not informing his relatives, neighbours or employers of his sexual orientation. The report also documents a pattern of police using torture and ill-treatment against gay and bisexual men in order to punish and humiliate them and to “persuade” them to pay a large bribe to regain their freedom. Under orders from Internal Affairs officials, doctors allegedly frequently conduct anal examinations to detect “evidence” of homosexual intercourse, despite the fact that they amount to ill-treatment and are “futile” and “unscientific”, according to the World Medical Association.
 
Ravshan, a young bisexual man, recalled how police treated him after detaining him: “They suspended me from the ceiling using handcuffs, beat me severely, and tried to rape me with a truncheon.” After that, police officers laid Ravshan on the floor and an officer jumped up and down on his stomach. Ravshan said: “I have never been beaten and intimidated like that in my entire life. I wanted to die to free myself from this torture”. When police threatened to imprison him under Article 120 unless he gave them 2000 USD, he paid up and was released.
 
The report also demonstrates that police often have access to the personal information of gay and bisexual men who are registered at HIV treatment centres.
 
Gay and bisexual men who turn to HIV centres for treatment cannot be sure that their personal information will stay confidential. We have documented cases where HIV centre staff have informed the police of the man’s sexual orientation, putting him at risk of persecution. This is a violation of the right to privacy and poses a major obstacle to accessing much needed health care”, said Yuri Yourski of ECOM.
             
As if this wasn’t enough, aggressive homophobes frequently seek out gays, bisexual men, trans people and those who promote tolerance toward the LGBT сommunity on social media, threaten them with violence and disseminate their names, contact details and photos on internet-based messaging services with calls to “punish” and kill them. When in danger, these people cannot rely on the police for protection. Reportedly, some aggressive homophobes maintain close relations with homophobic police officers and share information about gays, bisexual men and trans people in order to harm them.
 
AHRCA President Nadejda Atayeva additionally pointed out that “there are cases where police have exploited the fear of being labelled as ‘gay’ by extending the threat of imprisonment under Article 120 beyond gay and bisexual, to heterosexual and pious Muslim men. This is yet another reason why this article, which opens the door to police abuse, has to be repealed.”
 
Additionally, the Uzbekistani authorities severely curtail the right to freedom of expression when it comes to expressions of support for LGBT people and disseminating information about human rights violations affecting them. For example, blogger Miraziz Bazarov was sentenced to three year’s restricted liberty in January 2022 to punish him for peacefully exercising his right to freedom of expression including by voicing solidarity with LGBT people.

His real name is known to the authors of this report but withheld to protect his safety.
       
In recent years, representatives of the Uzbekistani government, the NCHR and the Ombudsperson for Human Rights of the Oliy Majlis (Legislative Chamber of Parliament) have all justified the criminalization of same-sex relations with references to religion, culture, tradition and public opinion, claiming that decriminalization would have negative implications for society and for the country’s reputation in the Muslim world. However, they have failed to acknowledge or address the fact that depriving people of their liberty because of their sexual orientation contradicts the country’s obligations under international human rights law.
 
 
................................
FOR MEDIA ENQUIRIES, PLEASE CONTACT:  
      
Nadejda Atayeva (Russian) 
President, Association for Human Rights in Central Asia (AHRCA)
Tel.: + 33 6 49 38 86 59; 
 
Yuri Yourski (English, Russian, Ukrainian)
Human Rights Coordinator, Eurasian Coalition on Health, Rights, Gender and Sexual Diversity (ECOM)
Tel.: +372 5397 1573
 
Anne Sunder-Plassmann (English, German, Russian)
Research and Publications Consultant, International Partnership for Human Rights (IPHR)
Tel.: +49-40-3863 1458